Preference for the Accusative Case in Names According to Abd al-Fattah al-Hamouz in His Book Grammatical Interpretation in the Holy Qur'an

Abstract

The research reveals that the preference for elliptical exception in affirmative cases regarding the accusative names, as discussed by Abd al-Fattah al-Hamouz in his book *Grammatical Interpretation*, is of great significance. The importance of this study lies in the fact that the verb "ittakhaada  is one of the transitive verbs that governs two objects when it implies "transformation" or "rendering"; otherwise, it governs only one object. Scholars have differed in defining the meaning of this verb, leading to divergent opinions on the determination of its object. The research problem centers on the preference for the object of the verb in the context of an implicit source constructed from "law"  and its surrounding context, which serves as an accusative object. Here, "law" functions as a particle indicating that something occurs because another event occurs, with its answer omitted, implied by "yawwadd" and the object of "yawwadd" being omitted, meaning one of them wishes for eternal life. The study confirms the preference for the object of transitive verbs such as "zanna" and its sisters, and the omission of one of the two objects of the verb "ittakhadha" according to al-Hamouz. The research concludes that there is a preference for the circumstantial qualifier or the permissibility of the circumstantial qualifier appearing from the annexed to without any conditions